AIR-EARTH
CURRENT AND E.M
The exchange between air and earth
surface is very complicated, and more than that there is even a very
far difference between the process on land surface and one at sea
surface. Both sea surface and land surface are huge themes to
research; we do not study the whole but something that relevant to
the charges of land and sea surface.
I-General
about atmosphere and its electrics:
Figure 1/I-Atmosphere
and electric in air (From manual book)
Atmosphere
so far is recognized as the air with many layers surrounding the Earth.
Certainly, atmosphere is the source of air for human being to breathe, nitrate
for fertilizer, CO2 for plants and forest…The figures re-posted in this chapter
are definitely excerpted from manuals about atmospheric electric, which present
and explain many complicated processes in our atmosphere.
Figure 1a/I-The
atmosphere
Figure 2/I-Air electric in atmosphere-The potential gradient
(From manual book)
As atmosphere is a mixture of all kinds of air that come
from soil and streams, rivers and oceans; therefore atmosphere is very
complicated. In addition, both soil and air are heated by sunlight and Earth
core, so there must be many processes happening by which we can’t anticipate.
Our discussion in this book won’t reach beyond the influence of atmosphere to
Earth magnetism.
2-Convection:
This is an activity that happens every time in atmosphere.
Figure 3/II- Convection
illustration
a/ Tense and ease: The vital contrast
is that the convection is rather tense on land and certainly ease on
sea surface.
The cool air flocks to the low pressure place where the hot
air just rises; this process makes another story:
-During air-flows touching Earth surface, the earth rotation
energizes every of them un-equally on each different wind direction.
-As the Earth is rotating at all the time; every single air-flow
is influenced, so each comes to fill a place but not a point; approximately each
direction is tangent to an imaginable circle and not to eliminate any other.
-The closer to equator, the faster the Earth surface moves;
this is how the Earth surface influences the wind, it is also named as Corriolis
Effect; (Approximately 463 m/s at equator, 432 m/s at latitude 210N(S)).
This effect writes its own story in another issue-the storm or typhoon. We are
expecting to discuss about it in another book.
-The solar heat does not distribute evenly everywhere,
therefore some place is warmer than the others, and the convection is such
different from one to another place, that’s how complicated the terrestrial
convection is.
Despite the convection does not contribute directly to E.M, it
does make somewhere more positive or leave somewhere more negative, that’s how
it does contribute indirectly to E.M.
b/ Charge separation:
In addition, no matter how much this issue is relevant to our problem, we can’t
ignore the magnetic force applying on either ‘’+ion’’ or ‘’–ion’’ during
convection. The force obviously separates ‘’+ion’’ from ‘’–ion’’ which used to
be mixed together in ion sheath on earth surface before convection. The
separation is then writing its own story; we won’t go all the way down every process
in this book.
II-Air-earth current in general (Jcd):
Like any other global matter, air-earth conduction current
is a huge issue that researched by several scientists. We don’t go in advance
of them but follow.
2/1 . Concept:
There is not only one definition to this concept found, but
in general the air-earth conduction current is so far recognized as a direct
current of charges under the influence of air-earth electric field, and counted
on square meter or square foot laid perpendicular to the general current.
2/2 . Air-earth current research:
‘’The air-earth conduction current’’ is a theme that has
been researched in centuries ago and the scientists still keep researching
everywhere in the world. One of the pioneers in this science is C.T.R Wilson
who pointed out that the global thunderstorm activity is energizing the
earth-ionosphere electric circuit. Nonetheless we don’t begin from C.T.R Wilson
but with the following that cited from a magazine:
2/3 . What is the role of air-earth
current in E.M?
For the matters relating to the sea surface, the book
’’Electromagnetic ocean effect’’ by NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmosphere
Administration) and another ‘’Oceanic Whitecaps and Their Role in Air-Sea
Exchange Processes’’ by group of scientists have presented rather well. Those
books are viable reference for the author of this book.
For the happenings on land, almost everything is presented
in tens of books about ‘’Atmosphere electric’’.
Our discussion is not about how to repeat or to re-check the
works that done by those forerunners but how to perceive those findings and how
the Earth Magnetism works under their light.
The following figures are displaying very important
researching results that facilitate our research:
Air-Earth conduction current and thunderstorm area
Figure 4/II-Thunderstorm
area & air-earth conduction current-Mauna Loa.
‘’The larger thunderstorm area expands, the more air-earth current increases’’.
The graph displays two plots that direct proportionally rise
and fall against the same variable-the time. Although the graph doesn’t say
which from the two is pushing behind the other but the analogy in there does suggest
the causal relation between them:
‘’The larger thunderstorm area expands, the more air-earth current increases’’.
Like any other global matter, air-earth conduction current
is a huge issue that researched by several scientists. We don’t go in advance
of them but follow.
The graph displays two plots that
direct proportionally rise and fall against the same variable-the
time. Although the graph doesn’t say which from the two is pushing
behind the other but the analogy in there does suggest the causal
relation between them:
‘’The larger
thunderstorm area expands, the more air-earth current increases’’.
‘’The steeper the potential gradient goes, the more air-earth current increases.’’
1-Assumptions:
This
question is right and nice indeed. Actually, the chemical reaction is happening
every time on the Earth to offset the any shortage. Moreover, another ion
source is the atmosphere which is ‘’paying’’ back in every lightning with a lot
of ions of both positive and negative charges.
4-Review: hourly changes and 24-hr cycle of Earth Magnetism.
4/1-To match Sun meridian passing to graph:
Figure 10c/I-Minute 720 until minute 900, the 2 plots make another dip.
CONCLUSIONS:
Figure 5/I- Potential
gradient & Air-Earth conduction current-Tirunelveli (India) at 8.73 N, 77.7
E. Recorded on 25th April, 2007.
The dotted plot displays air-earth current, average value in
every minute with Wilson’s plate. The continuous plot is for potential gradient
with passive antenna.
Unlike the figure (5/II) that doesn’t specify which is functioning
on the other as variable. This graph (6/II) displays 2 in 1, where one of the
two, potential gradient and the air-earth current density, definitely depends
on the other:
‘’The steeper the potential gradient goes, the more air-earth current increases.’’
Although we are working with gradient but it is not in our
discussion. Equation, differentiation as well as gradient are left for
mathematicians; while the built graph is for us.
The above result is obtained at Tirunelveli (South India) on
25th April 2007, but actually, except the local sunrise enhancement,
the result is quite analogous with every different observer in the world.
III-Scrutiny on Paradox, Questions and Causality:
Upon those records above and especially the true details of
graph built on 25 April 2007 at Tirunelveli (South India).
Let’s figure out the causal relation between sunshine and
air-earth conduction current.
Argument: (Although sea
and land don’t make a capacitor, in such a relation that the negative amplitude
on one plate is responding to the positive amplitude on the other, but they are
in electrically responsive relation to maintain the Earth about a neutral
electrically charged body).
1-Assumptions:
a-When the Sun shines on the continent, it does not only
energize the free ions on land surface, but also heats up the land to enhance
the convection on there. The enhanced convection in its turn is to blow the air
up to free the ion sheath from land surface.
b-The sea-land difference is then resulted in the real
contrast between continent and ocean under sunshine. Land’s free ions are
energized under sunshine like the happening in photocell, and each locale is
different to another; while all oceans are unified and make only single
electrode due to their good electrical conductivity. So, land is localism while
the sea is globalism.
c-There had been no solar storm happening to the atmosphere
and Earth on 25 April 2007, and so the U2 was unchanged within that 24-hour
time of our problem.
Figure 7/I-Localism
in land charge-one is different to another.
d-The Sun time at Suva (Fiji) indicates that there is no
considerable difference between GMT+12 (as geographical calculations) and real
time at longitude 1800; therefore we may consider the meridian
passing almost as instant local time at any locale in the world.
2-Arguments of Electric paradox & Earth
surface charge: ‘’losing electrons to be more negative?’’
+a/The continent is losing
electrons and becomes more positive? This question is set to many people
and definitely I don’t believe the argument.
Like any material, continent is made of soil, stone and
normal material. Under sunshine the continent must lose ion (both positive and
negative) and become positive, this is a question?
+b/The average ratio +2000/-1000:
In reality, the convection makes land surface losing ions of
both positive and negative. The bold issue we consider is the ratio between
positive ion and negative ion in every CC of air in land (not at sea side or
sea surface), it is averaged as +2000/-1000, or (2) positive on (1) negative in
city; so we should consider the land surface as losing +ions and definitely the
Earth becomes more negative.
The charge of the Earth (continents and oceans) becomes more
negative when larger part of continent is shined; this is a fact and the matter
of fact. We rather discuss about its consequence.
Where no sunlight is shining on land, the surface is not
heated up and so no convection is built and nothing special happens. As soon as
sunlight shines on land, it is heated up and the convection is built and
becoming tense. The convection clears up the land surface which used to be
covered with ion sheath on it, and so the land surface becomes less positive or
said specifically that the surface in convection becomes negative. We should
emphasize the SURFACE and only the surface matter.
+c/Balance charged status of the
Earth:
Argument: The positive
effect impacts on ocean becomes less, so to make the ion sheath (rather
negative) above water surface loose, the ions in there can be freed rapidly;
the charge balance is such maintained?
Not really, the reality does not happen in such normal way.
The ions on sea surface are stacked on each other, accumulated and controlled by
many different rules, not just static electric force. In short, the ease
convection happens on there (ref. to ‘’convection’’) and so the balance can be
broken on favour of sea surface charge.
Thus, every ion freed from ocean surface would have to stay in
the ion sheath; the lateness or ‘’retardation’’ happens to the whole oceans to stabilize
the Earth electric status.
The magic act is then working when Sunshine is more on land
than sea; in the imbalance between positive land and negative sea charge, the
sea surface seems to be unchanged while the land surface becomes more negative
because losing positive ions.
Thus, the convection and retardation should be the motives
to make to Earth more negative and even many more than that. This is still a
question for further debate.
Figure 8/I-The ion
sheath blew or retarded.
As mentioned above, the ion freed from land cum the
difference in convection between sea and land are the key reasons of the rule
‘’to lose ions to be more negative’’ and not the paradox that ‘’to lose
electron to be more negative’’. The paradox found happening to the set of
Sea-Land-Sunshine on the Earth is wrongly ascribed to static electric force. Actually
it is pure static electric, simple that losing positive ions is to be more
negative.
This rule is almost applicable to whole the Earth and not
specific to any locale or it is said: the globalism of the law.
From a book ‘’The Oceanic Whitecaps and their roles in
Air-Sea exchange processes’’-D.Reidel Publishing company, P.O. Box 17, 3300 AA
Dordrecht, Holland; we may cite an excerpt of argument: ‘’It has long been recognized that as the Earth rotates, global
thunderstorm frequency and the magnitude of the negative charge carried by the
Earth are at maximum when the Sun shines on continents and convective activity
is most tense, and at minimum when the Sun is shining on the ocean and
convection is less tense.’’ (p219)
(PROBLEM: (The real data are not sufficient to
set up a pragmatic problem, therefore this is not solved in this book, just
entertaining the physics and math lovers).
Suppose the average
condensation of ions and their ratio on world’s land is (+1500/-1000) in every
cubic centimetre (CC). Average land height (above average sea level):10 m.
Average thickness of ion layer is 10 m for either sea or land.
Questions: What is the
average ratio of +ions/-ions at sea surface to maintain an electrically neutral
Earth? What is contribution of those to the Earth Magnetism if neutral Earth is
maintained?(This problem is backing the argument presented in Biot-Savart
expression that the magnetic intensity is inversely proportional to the squared
distance from a charge to the centre of its hoop. In reality, everywhere the
ion status is different and depending on local conditions).
The following is a researching record in some locale of
Indian Ocean, somewhere the condensed positive ions are found. We can have
reference from the table, and note that it is not incorporated in the above
problem.
+d/The Consequence and Causality: (Figure 8a/II).
We may make it clear by supposing that there is a truly neutral
point in figure 8a/II, which demonstrates a mock diagram of the Earth’s
potential: U1 and the other is U2-potential of ionized layer are taken.
Figure 8a/I-Potential
of ionized layer and Earth.
The potential U2 is relatively stable unless solar storm
happens, while the magnitude of Earth charge-U1- is changing at all the time in
accordance with the Sun shined land area. The more sunshine the more positive
ion the land loses; while the negative sea surface is stable, this status makes
the Earth more negative.
Consequently, the variation happens with the voltage between
ionized layer and Earth:
V= U2-U1 (1-3)
As soon as the potential U1 goes up-and-down, the voltage V goes
down-and-up, or in another word:
The more negative Earth, the
higher voltage between ionized layer and Earth is.
Certainly any change in voltage leads to the change in
air-earth conduction current. This is another way by which the Sun can influence
the Earth; therefore:
With the brokerage of Earth’s
atmosphere the Sun can affect the Earth by several ways.
+e/A question from critics: the
Earth is losing ions at all the time and becomes un-neutral, how is the Earth
balanced back?
This
question is right and nice indeed. Actually, the chemical reaction is happening
every time on the Earth to offset the any shortage. Moreover, another ion
source is the atmosphere which is ‘’paying’’ back in every lightning with a lot
of ions of both positive and negative charges.
4-Review: hourly changes and 24-hr cycle of Earth Magnetism.
-Every day, when the GMT is at 0.0 (or midnight), the local
time at the longitude 1800 is midday or solar noon by geographical time
calculation.
The purpose of this arrangement is to match Sun’s meridian
passing time with local time throughout round clock or 24 hrs.
4/1-To match Sun meridian passing to graph:
We consider some specific locales under the Sun meridian
passing from 0.0 minute to 1440 minute (24 GMT).
The graph begins at ‘’0’’ minute to 1440 minutes while the
Sun is at meridian above 1800 to come westward.
Fig. 9/I-Solar noon
at 1800E when GMT is 0.0
Therefore we got to turn the world map up-side-down and
attach to the graph to matching one to the other.
Figure 10/I-Two
processes, one is approximately matching the other,
from minute 00 up to
minute 1440.
4/2-With a series of assumptions, we may carry out a review:
+Primary demonstration from graph:
-Let’s start at 0.0 GMT from the longitude 1800, the
Sun is passing meridian and begins its daily trip westward through a half of Pacific
Ocean with East Russia, China, Australia, New Zealand…South East Asia.
-Within about 2 hrs after 0.0 GMT, the Sun is still shining
on North America but goes westward; then no more America but a bit of Asia is
shined instead. The Pacific Ocean is the main under Sun. Air-earth current as
well as thunderstorm area are sinking to bottom.
Therefore the image is demonstrating nothing tense except
some lightning happens at Japan or Australia (as normally found).
-After 400 minutes, the Sun is above East Indian Ocean,
about 2-3 hrs after leaving Japan, Australia behind. The air-earth current
starts soaring up, this happening is attributed for thunder cloud establishing
in Japan, Australia or even at Philippine and Indonesia.
-The next is Indian
Ocean with Bangladesh, India, Pakistan…Middle East and East Africa. The West
Africa and Atlantic Ocean and Europe & Africa …
-From minute 480 to minute 600, the Sun is almost above
Africa. At this time, the Asian critical region is far away, while the thunder
cloud in Africa is established.
- The Sun is passing the Prime longitude Greenwich at minute
720th then to switch to the other half of the trip from Greenwich
(at minute 720th) to 1800 (at minute 1440th).
But from minute 720, both plots are likely falling down on a steep road, the
Sun is leaving Africa. Then as soon as the Sun shines on Brazil, the two plots
are rising up while the Sun is going to shine tensely & continuously on
both North and South America.
-There seems no gap between sun-meridian passing time and variableness
of the potential gradient (V/m) as well as Air-earth current density (pA/m2).
They all depend on the land shined area; or where the narrowest shined land
area is found along within 24 hrs, the lowest potential gradient and air-earth
current density are found as well.
4/3-Comment: In general, the air-earth conduction
current varies against the following variables:
-The local soil characteristics: The above figure (10/II) hints
that the soil of each area is showing off its characteristics under sunshine,
this is likely the localism and still a none-answered question.
-The local thunderstorm area: The thunderstorm influences on
air-earth current, this has been pointed out by Wilson in centuries ago. We
don’t debate again but depict it by our own way and it will work in the next
chapter.
-Ocean electric conductivity: The globalism is feature of
the ocean due to its electric conductibility. By such feature the potential at
everywhere on the ocean, and seas connected with the ocean, is at the same
value.
4/4-Special periods of time in a day: (Add another period
at beginning for Pacific).
It is known to everyone that approximately the Sun is
shining 900 both westward and eastward longitudes from any meridian,
and so the meridian passing can justify the ratio of land shined area on ocean
shined area but can’t justify definitely the air-earth current which still
depends on something else. Notwithstanding, we do consider the following
special periods of time in a day for reference:
Figure 10b/I-From minute 420 until minute 500, the Sun
meridian at North Indian Ocean and the plots make an impressive dip.
Figure 10c/I-Minute 720 until minute 900, the 2 plots make another dip.
Figure 10d/I-From minute 1020 until minute 1440, the most mystery period in a day.
After above demonstrations, we realize that the sunshine on land is a magic agent that makes the air-earth conduction current to vary. The following is another figure which demonstrates the hourly variableness of E.M with reference observer VSS:
Figure 11/I-Hourly
Range for VSS
We need to discuss about the ‘’how’’ at the hourly variation
in some other chapter afterward.
CONCLUSIONS:
-By attaching air-earth current graph to up-side-down world
map (figure 10/II), we realize that any variation in Sun shined land area must
lead to respective change in the global total land charge without any
retardation.
-The more sunshine on land, the more positive ions it loses;
then the more negative the Earth is. This issue is the key argument which was
debated and recognized in history; we just recall in this chapter for reference
and again re-recognize.
-The air-earth conduction current incorporates with
convection to make one local land different to another on term of electric
charge.
-Land surface vs Sea surface: The convection on land makes
land more negative; while less convection at sea surface leaves it stable.
-The particular characteristic of sea surface charge is
globalism because all the oceans are connected and homogeneous electrically.
-For every Sun’s position on the sky, we always find out a
land area shined and the other is ocean area to be so; and the ratio between one
to the other of those two under sunlight at each respective time is indirectly
demonstrated in the figure 6/II as well as the figure 10/II -The Air-Earth
conduction current.
-Although the indirect causality between air-earth
conduction current and E.M is defined, the air-earth conduction current only
contributes in some from 7 compositions of Earth Magnetism. Notwithstanding the
variableness in air-earth current leads to 24-hr cycle of Earth-Magnetism which
has been pointed out long ago in science history.
No comments:
Post a Comment