Dear Readers,
You are welcome here to share my view, my way in scientific
research.
-Where a mass is, there is a gravity field around.
-Where an electric charge is, there is an electric field
around.
-Where a magnet is, there is a
magnetic field around.
Nonetheless, on the reverse wise
of the above statement:
‘’Where a magnetic field is
available, there is a magnet in it’’ creates a long debate; especially about
Earth Magnetism. The debate does not just take a decade, it is prolonging in
centuries.
I am not writing about an analogue
to this: ‘’Where a mass is, there is a gravity field around’’; but basically I
argue about Earth Magnetism that the field of Earth Magnetism is made out of
the moves of many electric charges, then the Earth core or anything else is
magnetized, reciprocally the apparent Earth Magnetic field is seen.
I trust and I am backed by a rule
that ‘’Where an electric charge moves, there is a magnetic field to be induced’’,
because that’s how the Earth Magnetism is built. The material in a magnetic
field can be magnetized, as Faraday’s Law of Magnetic Induction did point out
in history.
The way I go along is the way I share my view with you.
Although the problems and solutions in this book are quite
theoretical but every assumption and solution depends on real data from many
different researchers in the world. The work costs me decades.
Where are those electric charges? That is a question, and I
got to find out the electric charges on the Earth, in atmosphere and in the
space near our Earth.
This book ‘’The basic problems for Earth Magnetism’’
contains problems and solution to each of them.
The major theory used in this book
is Biot-Savart and Ampere-Maxwell. The data used in this book are findings of
NOAA, NASA and from many other data sources in the world.
The book is broken down into two major parts; the first is
for problems of charges on Earth. The charge on Earth is realized long ago such
as charged cloud and its opposite patch on Earth surface. I am not the first
who figures out the charges, but a person who connects the area of world’s
charged (thunder) cloud with air-earth current in every 24hr of our Earth rotation, even if no direct equation is
given out for Earth Magnetism.
As matter of facts, the Earth is rotating around its own
axis. Therefore every charge on it can induce magnetism to Earth.
Several people keep questioning me about the move of
electric charge, I don’t respond directly to their question but hint that
whether the speed 462 m/s of everything at Earth’s equator makes sense to
them?!
The second part is for external charge such as one on Van
Allen Belt and the other is on Moon. The charge on any of those above is
obviously assumed, but depending on a reality that there is almost no
absolutely neutral object found, which is neither negative nor positive. The
principal: ‘’The more sun light strikes on an object surface, the more
electrons it loses’’ did lead Albert Einstein to his invention of solar cell.
The mentioned invention leads to assumption that the Moon has two opposite semi -spheres, the shined one is positive charged while the dark one is definitely
negative. That is not it; the Moon is even not neutral or balanced in electric
charge but is also lacking electrons. Lunar total charge may be positive
sometime and keeps changing due to the change of solar radiation. My assumption
does encounter a lot, certainly, critics. A predominant question is also a hint
that if an object lacks of electron, its ambiance will provide electron; if the
object is rich of electrons, the protons from its ambiance will come to balance
it. This question actually is still in the invention of Albert Einstein.
The last major question in my debate with other people is
‘’Why do the magnetic poles stay away from Earth’s true poles?’’, although I
mentioned in the preamble that I never work with rotors or anything inside the
Earth. But I do propose a non-professional answer that each plate is a huge
magnet in general Earth Magnetic field; the poles in apparent Earth Magnetic
field are shaped by the total of every individual magnetic field of all
continents and plates. Definitely, many people are not satisfied with such a
non-professional answer and go forward with another question that the North
magnetic pole is drifting toward Russia, and the drifting is the beginning of
flipping which will happen in 1000 year time, can charge move help to stop it?
Although this book is not written about the magnetic pole flipping, and I don’t
believe in the conclusion that the magnetic pole drifting; but anyway I point
out that the African continent is moving northward as fast as 8 inches/year.
Look at our Earth again; we may realize that Americas continent is Earth’s back
bone while Africa and Euro-Asia are moving northward, whereby Africa is much
faster than Euro-Asia.
Certainly many people are not satisfied with my answer; they
have no choice but wait to read the research result from world scientists who
study that subject.
For the 1st publishing on Amazon Kindle, I would like to give ‘’I-Biot-Sawart’’ expression for anyone who
attempts to calculate how much an electric charge on Earth surface can
contribute to Earth Magnetism.
In order to apply I-Biot-Sawart expression, we need to have
value of electric charge (q) and a table of distance to Earth rotation axis
(the ‘’r’’).
With I-Biot-Sawart (Interpolated Biot-Sawart), we can state
that: if I am given with a charge and its position on our global coordinates, I
can calculate right away how much that charge contributes to Earth Magnetism.
This publishing is bearing in it a great thank to the Late
Professor Nguyen Dinh Noan, and PhD Vu Bang for encourage and great help during
I study this subject.
Thank for your kind attention.
Ho Chi Minh City March 9, 2019
NV Cuong
