Showing posts with label Earth Poles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Earth Poles. Show all posts

Sunday, 20 July 2025

Earth magnetism-Researching News

How Earth’s Magnetic Field Influences Flows in the Planet’s Core

(This article has been published long ago, just re-posted in this blog for further reference. Anyhow, comments are welcome.)


October 31, 2024• Physics 17, 142

 

A “Little Earth Experiment” inside a giant magnet sheds light on so-far-unexplained flow patterns in Earth’s interior.

 

Sketch of outer-core flows derived from data from the Swarm mission (plotted looking down on the North Pole). The black lines indicate flows averaged over two decades, showing patterns that violate the Taylor-Proudman theorem by crossing a boundary defined by the solid-core radius. The red and blue colors indicate azimuthal-flow components.





Earth’s inner core is a hot, solid ball—about 20% of Earth’s radius—made of an iron alloy. The planet’s outer core, beneath the rocky mantle, is a colder, liquid metal. Geophysics models explain that, since the movement of a liquid metal induces electrical currents, and currents induce a magnetic field, convection and rotation produce our planet’s magnetic fields. But these models typically neglect an important contribution: how Earth’s magnetic field influences the very flows that generate it. Alban Pothérat of Coventry University, UK, and collaborators have now developed a theory that accounts for such feedback and vetted it using a lab-based “Little Earth Experiment” [1]. Their results inform a model pinpointing processes that might explain the discrepancies between theoretical predictions and satellite observations of Earth, opening new perspectives on the study of geophysical flows.

Understanding flows in planetary interiors is a long-standing challenge. “If you don’t account for the fact that the magnetic field itself changes the flow, then you won’t get the right flow,” says Pothérat. Indeed, both satellite data from the European Space Agency’s Swarm mission and state-of-the-art numerical simulations indicate certain circulating core flows where liquid produced at the boundary of the inner core is fed into the outer core, moves upward toward the poles, and from there finally flows back inward (Fig. 1).

These observations can’t be explained by the established theory for rotating fluids, which assumes that magnetic-field-induced forces on the flow can be neglected, as they are dominated by rotation-induced Coriolis forces. If rotation is fast enough, goes the theory, flows of liquid are two dimensional and lie in the plane normal to the rotation axis. For planetary interiors, this imposes a constraint known as the Taylor-Proudman theorem: Fluid cannot flow across a boundary, called the tangent cylinder, defined by a radial distance equal to the solid-core radius. The flows documented on Earth, however, violate this condition. To explain the discrepancy, what’s needed is an experiment that captures convection, rotation, and magnetism all at once, says Pothérat.






Sketch of the setup used by Pothérat and co-workers. A liquid-containing hemisphere, a heating element, and a water tank represent Earth’s outer core, inner core, and mantle, respectively. The structure sits on a rotating table in a 10-tesla magnetic field, while a laser injected from the top allows the researchers to map the flow field.

Pothérat and his colleagues have realized such an experiment, using it to vet an extension of the established model associated with the Taylor-Proudman constraint. Previous Earth-mimicking setups used rotating tanks filled with a highly conductive but opaque liquid metal, which prevented the visualization of liquid flows. The team’s “Little Earth Experiment” (Fig. 2) instead used a low-conductivity, transparent sulphuric acid solution, which allowed the acquisition of maps that visualize flow structures in a magnetorotating fluid. “That’s the big originality,” says Pothérat. Since their liquid was much less conducting than a liquid metal, the team needed a large external magnetic field to create magnetic forces sufficiently strong to mimic planet-like conditions. They achieved such conditions using a 10-tesla magnetic field produced by the giant magnet of the Grenoble High Magnetic Field Laboratory in France. “The real feat of our experiment is fitting a rotating tank inside this enormous magnet,” says Pothérat.

The Little Earth Experiment involves a rotating hemispheric dome sitting on a flat, rotating table. The transparent-glass hemisphere was filled with a conductive fluid, which represented the outer core of Earth. At the hemisphere’s flat bottom, a cylindrical heating element protruding into the liquid played the role of Earth’s inner solid core, driving convection. A water-filled, cylindrical plastic tank sat on top of the hemisphere, providing a cooling effect that mimicked that due to Earth’s mantle. By lacing the conductive fluid with hundreds of thousands of micron-diameter hollow glass particles, which scattered incoming laser light, the researchers could track the particles’ positions and measure the fluid’s velocity at multiple points as the tank rotated.

The key measurements were maps of the fluid’s velocity at two heights—one near the solid core and one at latitudes close to the top of the hemisphere—obtained for electromagnetic and rotational forces representative of Earth-like conditions. Fitting such data, the researchers calculated that at least 10% of the liquid flowed in a circulating pattern similar to that occurring in Earth’s core: From the solid core the liquid flowed toward the top of the dome and then toward the equatorial regions. “We can finally see what the flow looks like,” says Pothérat.

The researchers established that the polar component of the magnetic field drives flow between polar and equatorial regions, concluding that this field-induced flow must be taken into account for explaining convective flows that can’t be described by rotation alone. Modifying the conventional theory by adding a magnetic field pointed in the polar direction allowed the researchers to predict exactly when and how much liquid flowed across. The magnetic field fully explains why the flow crosses the tangent-cylinder boundary, says Pothérat.

Hao Cao, a geophysics researcher at the University of California, Los Angeles’s Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, calls the work “impressive” and says that the experimental verification of flow regimes “illustrates the critical role of magnetic fields in shaping fluid dynamics in Earth’s and planetary cores.” He adds a cautionary note regarding its direct application to real planetary cores, pointing out that “the fluid dynamics in this experiment has minimal impact on the magnetic field itself.” That’s not the situation expected in planetary cores, he says.

–Rachel Berkowitz


Rachel Berkowitz is a Corresponding Editor for Physics Magazine based in Vancouver, Canada.

References

  1. A. Pothérat et al., “Magnetic Taylor-Proudman constraint explains flows into the tangent cylinder,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 184101 (2024).

 




Sunday, 10 March 2019

E.M ON AMAZON KINDLE





Dear  Readers,

You are welcome here to share my view, my way in scientific research.

-Where a mass is, there is a gravity field around.
-Where an electric charge is, there is an electric field around.
-Where a magnet is, there is a magnetic field around.                                                                                

Nonetheless, on the reverse wise of the above statement:

‘’Where a magnetic field is available, there is a magnet in it’’ creates a long debate; especially about Earth Magnetism. The debate does not just take a decade, it is prolonging in centuries.

I am not writing about an analogue to this: ‘’Where a mass is, there is a gravity field around’’; but basically I argue about Earth Magnetism that the field of Earth Magnetism is made out of the moves of many electric charges, then the Earth core or anything else is magnetized, reciprocally the apparent Earth Magnetic field is seen.

I trust and I am backed by a rule that ‘’Where an electric charge moves, there is a magnetic field to be induced’’, because that’s how the Earth Magnetism is built. The material in a magnetic field can be magnetized, as Faraday’s Law of Magnetic Induction did point out in history.

The way I go along is the way I share my view with you.
Although the problems and solutions in this book are quite theoretical but every assumption and solution depends on real data from many different researchers in the world. The work costs me decades.

Where are those electric charges? That is a question, and I got to find out the electric charges on the Earth, in atmosphere and in the space near our Earth.

This book ‘’The basic problems for Earth Magnetism’’ contains problems and solution to each of them.

The major theory used in this book is Biot-Savart and Ampere-Maxwell. The data used in this book are findings of NOAA, NASA and from many other data sources in the world.

The book is broken down into two major parts; the first is for problems of charges on Earth. The charge on Earth is realized long ago such as charged cloud and its opposite patch on Earth surface. I am not the first who figures out the charges, but a person who connects the area of world’s charged (thunder) cloud with air-earth current in every 24hr of our Earth rotation, even if no direct equation is given out for Earth Magnetism.

As matter of facts, the Earth is rotating around its own axis. Therefore every charge on it can induce magnetism to Earth.
Several people keep questioning me about the move of electric charge, I don’t respond directly to their question but hint that whether the speed 462 m/s of everything at Earth’s equator makes sense to them?!

The second part is for external charge such as one on Van Allen Belt and the other is on Moon. The charge on any of those above is obviously assumed, but depending on a reality that there is almost no absolutely neutral object found, which is neither negative nor positive. The principal: ‘’The more sun light strikes on an object surface, the more electrons it loses’’ did lead Albert Einstein to his invention of solar cell. The mentioned invention leads to assumption that the Moon has two opposite semi -spheres, the shined one is positive charged while the dark one is definitely negative. That is not it; the Moon is even not neutral or balanced in electric charge but is also lacking electrons. Lunar total charge may be positive sometime and keeps changing due to the change of solar radiation. My assumption does encounter a lot, certainly, critics. A predominant question is also a hint that if an object lacks of electron, its ambiance will provide electron; if the object is rich of electrons, the protons from its ambiance will come to balance it. This question actually is still in the invention of Albert Einstein.

The last major question in my debate with other people is ‘’Why do the magnetic poles stay away from Earth’s true poles?’’, although I mentioned in the preamble that I never work with rotors or anything inside the Earth. But I do propose a non-professional answer that each plate is a huge magnet in general Earth Magnetic field; the poles in apparent Earth Magnetic field are shaped by the total of every individual magnetic field of all continents and plates. Definitely, many people are not satisfied with such a non-professional answer and go forward with another question that the North magnetic pole is drifting toward Russia, and the drifting is the beginning of flipping which will happen in 1000 year time, can charge move help to stop it? Although this book is not written about the magnetic pole flipping, and I don’t believe in the conclusion that the magnetic pole drifting; but anyway I point out that the African continent is moving northward as fast as 8 inches/year. Look at our Earth again; we may realize that Americas continent is Earth’s back bone while Africa and Euro-Asia are moving northward, whereby Africa is much faster than Euro-Asia.

Certainly many people are not satisfied with my answer; they have no choice but wait to read the research result from world scientists who study that subject.

For the 1st publishing on Amazon Kindle, I would like to give ‘’I-Biot-Sawart’’ expression for anyone who attempts to calculate how much an electric charge on Earth surface can contribute to Earth Magnetism.







In order to apply I-Biot-Sawart expression, we need to have value of electric charge (q) and a table of distance to Earth rotation axis (the ‘’r’’).

With I-Biot-Sawart (Interpolated Biot-Sawart), we can state that: if I am given with a charge and its position on our global coordinates, I can calculate right away how much that charge contributes to Earth Magnetism.

This publishing is bearing in it a great thank to the Late Professor Nguyen Dinh Noan, and PhD Vu Bang for encourage and great help during I study this subject.

Thank for your kind attention.

Ho Chi Minh City March 9, 2019 
NV Cuong

Friday, 22 December 2017

CHAPTER IV-MAGNETISM AT THE POLES

TWIN CONES AT POLES 


















.






 





Figure 23/VI-Every Δ delta stacked on the others.




Figure 24/VI-Sun-Earth-Moon on sky









THIS BOOK CERTAINLY DOES NOT PRESENT EVERYTHING ABOUT EARTH MAGNETISM, AND THE AUTHOR BELIEVES THAT THERE ARE DEFINITELY STILL LOT OF PROBLEMS FOR EARTH MAGNETISM TO BE SOLVED.