Showing posts with label Electric field. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Electric field. Show all posts

Sunday, 10 March 2019

E.M ON AMAZON KINDLE





Dear  Readers,

You are welcome here to share my view, my way in scientific research.

-Where a mass is, there is a gravity field around.
-Where an electric charge is, there is an electric field around.
-Where a magnet is, there is a magnetic field around.                                                                                

Nonetheless, on the reverse wise of the above statement:

‘’Where a magnetic field is available, there is a magnet in it’’ creates a long debate; especially about Earth Magnetism. The debate does not just take a decade, it is prolonging in centuries.

I am not writing about an analogue to this: ‘’Where a mass is, there is a gravity field around’’; but basically I argue about Earth Magnetism that the field of Earth Magnetism is made out of the moves of many electric charges, then the Earth core or anything else is magnetized, reciprocally the apparent Earth Magnetic field is seen.

I trust and I am backed by a rule that ‘’Where an electric charge moves, there is a magnetic field to be induced’’, because that’s how the Earth Magnetism is built. The material in a magnetic field can be magnetized, as Faraday’s Law of Magnetic Induction did point out in history.

The way I go along is the way I share my view with you.
Although the problems and solutions in this book are quite theoretical but every assumption and solution depends on real data from many different researchers in the world. The work costs me decades.

Where are those electric charges? That is a question, and I got to find out the electric charges on the Earth, in atmosphere and in the space near our Earth.

This book ‘’The basic problems for Earth Magnetism’’ contains problems and solution to each of them.

The major theory used in this book is Biot-Savart and Ampere-Maxwell. The data used in this book are findings of NOAA, NASA and from many other data sources in the world.

The book is broken down into two major parts; the first is for problems of charges on Earth. The charge on Earth is realized long ago such as charged cloud and its opposite patch on Earth surface. I am not the first who figures out the charges, but a person who connects the area of world’s charged (thunder) cloud with air-earth current in every 24hr of our Earth rotation, even if no direct equation is given out for Earth Magnetism.

As matter of facts, the Earth is rotating around its own axis. Therefore every charge on it can induce magnetism to Earth.
Several people keep questioning me about the move of electric charge, I don’t respond directly to their question but hint that whether the speed 462 m/s of everything at Earth’s equator makes sense to them?!

The second part is for external charge such as one on Van Allen Belt and the other is on Moon. The charge on any of those above is obviously assumed, but depending on a reality that there is almost no absolutely neutral object found, which is neither negative nor positive. The principal: ‘’The more sun light strikes on an object surface, the more electrons it loses’’ did lead Albert Einstein to his invention of solar cell. The mentioned invention leads to assumption that the Moon has two opposite semi -spheres, the shined one is positive charged while the dark one is definitely negative. That is not it; the Moon is even not neutral or balanced in electric charge but is also lacking electrons. Lunar total charge may be positive sometime and keeps changing due to the change of solar radiation. My assumption does encounter a lot, certainly, critics. A predominant question is also a hint that if an object lacks of electron, its ambiance will provide electron; if the object is rich of electrons, the protons from its ambiance will come to balance it. This question actually is still in the invention of Albert Einstein.

The last major question in my debate with other people is ‘’Why do the magnetic poles stay away from Earth’s true poles?’’, although I mentioned in the preamble that I never work with rotors or anything inside the Earth. But I do propose a non-professional answer that each plate is a huge magnet in general Earth Magnetic field; the poles in apparent Earth Magnetic field are shaped by the total of every individual magnetic field of all continents and plates. Definitely, many people are not satisfied with such a non-professional answer and go forward with another question that the North magnetic pole is drifting toward Russia, and the drifting is the beginning of flipping which will happen in 1000 year time, can charge move help to stop it? Although this book is not written about the magnetic pole flipping, and I don’t believe in the conclusion that the magnetic pole drifting; but anyway I point out that the African continent is moving northward as fast as 8 inches/year. Look at our Earth again; we may realize that Americas continent is Earth’s back bone while Africa and Euro-Asia are moving northward, whereby Africa is much faster than Euro-Asia.

Certainly many people are not satisfied with my answer; they have no choice but wait to read the research result from world scientists who study that subject.

For the 1st publishing on Amazon Kindle, I would like to give ‘’I-Biot-Sawart’’ expression for anyone who attempts to calculate how much an electric charge on Earth surface can contribute to Earth Magnetism.







In order to apply I-Biot-Sawart expression, we need to have value of electric charge (q) and a table of distance to Earth rotation axis (the ‘’r’’).

With I-Biot-Sawart (Interpolated Biot-Sawart), we can state that: if I am given with a charge and its position on our global coordinates, I can calculate right away how much that charge contributes to Earth Magnetism.

This publishing is bearing in it a great thank to the Late Professor Nguyen Dinh Noan, and PhD Vu Bang for encourage and great help during I study this subject.

Thank for your kind attention.

Ho Chi Minh City March 9, 2019 
NV Cuong

Thursday, 9 August 2018

MAXWELL EQUATIONS WITH E.M

(This article comprises of 3 parts: The first is, almost about the curl operator (likely a copy from manual book) and a half of Maxwell differential equation; the second and third parts are totally written by author. An important note is that the equation can be solved only with time and place; furthermore almost every quantity in the problem is vector. You can understand and debate more after reading through.)


I-                 Maxwell differential equation:

The equation set is named after the physicist and mathematician James Clerk Maxwell.
Curl of B or

is a differential equation in the set of following several equations:


Figure 01-Set of Maxwell equations

From Maxwell-Faraday to Maxwell’s addition on Ampere, the relation between magnetic field and electric field is formulated. The consequence is that a magnetic field induces the electric field to change or vice versa. This is fundamental to electromagnetic wave theory, and by such pattern the electromagnetic wave is transmitted.

By mathematics manual, the equation is solved as following:
If a given ‘’B’’ is

The vector quantity ‘’B’’ is almost unique to any position in the world.
The curl of B in the Cartesian coordinate is:





Where unit vector ‘’x’’ indicates that the value before it is on ‘’x’’ wise, or( is on ‘’x’’ direction or illustrating the functioning of By and Bz on ‘’x’’. It is ditto to ‘’y’’ and ‘’z’’ for each of 2 other directions.


The ‘’Curl of B’’ may be understood as B gradient with compositions on ‘’x’’, on ‘’y’’ and on ‘’z’’.
Since the mid-20th century, the Maxwell's equations are realized as giving out un-accurate result, ‘’but a classical limit of the fundamental theory of quantum electrodynamics.’’ An example of non-accurate result is its application to Earth Magnetism.

Notwithstanding, for the sake of explaining 24-hr E.M revolution, Ampere’s circuital law (with Maxwell’s addition) in differential equation is applied. That equation is to be reviewed.



 II-Problem of 𝜵*B=µ0*(J +Ɛ0* δE/δt):

1-Twin graph of J and gradient of E:

The following graph is built out of real data that observed at Tirunelveli (South India). Both plots on this graph (gradient of atmospheric electric potential ‘’E’’ and density of air-earth current‘’J’’) are averaged in every minute; one is in proportion with the other (fig. 02).


Figure 2- The air-earth current ‘’J’’ is averaged in every minute, observed with Wilson antenna(broken line).The continuous line is performing the gradient of atmospheric potential that measured with passive antenna at Tirunelveli on 25 April 2007 (reference to Atmosphere Electric of NOAA).

After every 24hr interval, both ‘’J’’ and ‘’E’’ (refer to the graph of figure 2) vary and especially their fluctuation repeat (24hr) on global scale except at locales where some specific matter effects on those 2 figures.

We may ask whether the fluctuations of ‘’J’’ and ’’E’’ contribute to Earth Magnetism and explained by Ampere-Maxwell equation?

Definitely the answer must be ‘’yes’’, and it is right in the Wikipedia for ‘’Ampère's law with Maxwell's addition the Ampere rule with Maxwell addendum says that magnetism can be created by both electric current(Ampere) and changing electric fields. This statement affirms that the fluctuations of both ‘’E’’ (potential gradient) and ‘’J’’ displacement current are inducing Earth Magnetism.

For Earth Magnetism, the contribution from atmospheric electric is obviously as mentioned above. But we need more argument anyway, if the terrestrial magnetic field is belonging to one of an individual magnetic bar, the above mentioned reason for Earth Magnetism ‘’Electric field change’’ may be accepted as the major; or implies: the atmospheric electric potential and displacement current vary to induce Earth Magnetism.

Actually the Earth Magnetism is a set of fields that induced by the moving of many electric charges, definitely neither just the fluctuations ‘’J’’ and ‘’E’’ nor a field of such a powerful magnetic bar inside the Earth core. But the Earth is magnetized by magnetic fields and then the fields expand outward from the Earth.

Notwithstanding we do carry out an express review to Ampere-Maxwell once as to consider ‘’J’’ and ‘’E’’ in the graph on figure 2.

General description in brief:

-The homographic plots are built out of real data that observed at Tirunelveli (South India). Both two quantities, air-earth current and gradient of atmospheric voltage, are fluctuating, and its fluctuation is repeated after every 24 hrs.

-The horizontal line is for time that calibrated in 60 minutes (1hr.)or 1440 minutes in 24 hrs.
-Assumption: Each 60 minute segment equals to 1 segment of 10 V/m on vertical line that performs gradient of atmospheric voltage, meantime equals to ½ of a segment on another vertical line which performs the density of air-earth current.

The world scientists spend a lot of time to debate about this problem, eventually they all recognise what happened as realities. I do explain about this question in ‘’Chapter I’’ of the book: ‘’the Earth Magnetism and some basic problems with sea-land surface, atmosphere, Van-Allan bell and Moon’’. The explanation in there also implies that the above graph may changes a bit in accordance with the change of position of the Sun relative to the Earth.

-The above graph is to apply worldwide because the data are recognised as the same for everywhere in the world. 

-There are always, within 24 hrs., 2 moments when air-earth current almost reaches zero while potential gradients are still hung at 100V/m or a bit better (the minute 175th and minute 785th). The plots are built of real data, therefore they don’t look similar to any standard graph such as Sin, Cos or Tg...

-There are many parts of those plots likely straight, some of the straight line is forward slash while some other is backward slash.
Figure 04- ‘’J’’ and ‘’E’’plots-Red colour column indicate‘’rising up’’,
while the grey is for falling down.

My way is to attribute a certain straight line to each part of ‘’E’’ plot. Seek for specific differentiation of potential gradient of ‘’E’’ on ‘’t’’ (time) in that part (  ).
Some tiny problem will be setup and sorted out during Q&A.

Q&A:
Q1-When does 𝛛E/𝛛t reach 0 in each 24hr interval?
Throughout a 24hr interval, the ‘’E’’ and ‘’J’’ graphs are rising up and falling down many times, the values of 𝛛E/𝛛t at every peak and every bottom are zero because where the tangent line are horizontal or parallel to (t) line.


Figure 05 –At every peak or bottom, the value of 𝛛E/𝛛t may reach Zero

Approximately 𝛛E/𝛛t may reach zero value at the following times 60, 90, 180, 400, 510, 640, 785, 1085, 1145, 1265th minutes.

When 𝛛E/𝛛t reaches zero, the value of 𝜵*B may be considered as function of ‘’J’’ only:

𝜵*B=µ0*J

As matter of facts, in the circumstances when 𝛛E/𝛛t=0, when 𝜵*B= µ0*J; the value of ‘’J’’ plays no important role, while the trend of electric field does. Refer to figure 04 above, right after minutes 179-180th, or at 510th, 785th, 1145th the value of 𝜵*B or gradient of B almost rocketing of falling down sharply.

Q2-The value of 𝜵*B at minute 960th GMT (The popular slope within 24hrs.)?

On figure 4, the minute 960th is belonging to a red part of the graph, it is rising. To solve this problem, we need the homographic graph for ‘’J’’ and ‘’E’’ (From NOAA), with some additional lines on it.

+We can find the value of ‘’J’’ at minute 960th by drawing a vertical-straight line through 960, we get Nand M when it meets the plot of ‘’J’’ and ‘’E’’.

From N, draw a horizontal line parallel with time line, it meets O’E’ at K; Position of K on O’E’ is to indicate value of ‘’J’’ which is approximately 0.62*10-12 Amp/m2.

+From M, graph of gradient E is approximately on a line that meets time line at D(approximately it is t=730). The line in 2D coordinates should be:
(y=ax+b).

+In order to find out 𝛛E/𝛛t, we consider a function of ‘’E’’ in the form y=ax+b at minute 960 GMT.
E=at+b (‘’t’’ is short for ‘’time’’), a=tg (MDH)) (This function is set up for M and its adjacency only).

𝛛E/𝛛t = a (Applied for the function of E=at+b).
Figure 6-Gradient E and displacement J with some additional lines at minute 960th.

The point M is chosen at a positive part of (forward and popular slope) of 24hr plot of gradient ‘’E’’.The line MD coincide with a part of the above plot and its function is: y=ax+b.

We got to set and solve a problem.With t=960, E=Em≈168 V/m and whent=730th, E=80 V/m. The results are:

a≈(168-80)/(960-730)=0.3826 and b≈-199.296

Thus, the function for E at t=960thcan be:

E=0.3826t - 199.296

Value of 𝛛E/𝛛t=0.3826 (indicates the slope of the line tangent to a curve at the intended point). The function for E as mentioned is applicable to the point M and its adjacencies only. For other parts of that plot, both ‘’a’’ and ‘’b’’ will be attributed with some different values.

With ‘’J’’=0.62 pA*m-2 at t=960 (1 pAmp/m2=10-12 Amp/m2, µ0=4π*10-7, Ɛ0 =5*10-15 (average between 3*10-15and8*10-15. Furthermore, we should note that 1 pA=10-12 Ampere).

𝜵*B=µ0*(J +Ɛ0* )=4π*10-7*(0.62*10-12+5*10-15*0.3826)=
=12.56637*10-7*(620*10-15+5*10-15*0.3826)=12.56637*10-7*621.913*10-15
=7.81519*103*10-15*10-7=7.81519*10-19

𝜵*B=7.81519*10-19

This is value of 𝜵*B at minute 960th GMT on daily basis.
-The value of 𝜵*Bat minute 960th GMT is found as an example that indicates that we are capable to find out value of 𝜵*B at any time in a day. As long as ‘’E’’ and ‘’J’’ fluctuate with 24hr revolution, the value of 𝜵*B does the same, and it can be considered as daily revolution of Earth Magnetism.

Q3-When and where we find 𝜵*B<0?

𝜵*B=µ0*(J +Ɛ0* δE/δt)

Let’s solve this problem:

If (J +Ɛ0* )<0
Then < -J/Ɛ0

When the value of ‘’E’’ is falling down, definitely  δE/δt  <0, but this problem requires a certain ‘’J’’.
The quantity ‘’J’’ varies within 0 and 1.25*10-12, while Ɛ0 does not change often, we supposed that
Ɛ0 is average between 3*10-15 and 8*10-15, and assumed as 5*10-15.

When ‘’J’’ is rather high, let’s consider J=1.25*10-12 Amp/m2 in our example, then: Then ≈-250, this is a slope of the ray that nearly vertical downward (890 43’).

If we consider ‘’J’’ at sometimes when its value is low, such as the duration from minute 150th to minute 160th, J ≈  0.05*10-12 Amp/m2. The same calculation as above is applied, we obtain:
≈-10, equivalent to tg of an angle 84015’ downward.


Figure 6a-Angle of 84015’ downward.

In brief, we can realize that the lower ‘’J’’ the more possible for 𝜵*B<0. Nonetheless, no matter how much the value of 𝜵*B gets lower under zero, this is to indicate that the amplitude of Earth Magnetism is getting down due to the fluctuation of displacement current ‘’J’’ and potential gradient ‘’E’’, they expect to be the same in the next day; and nothing else about the average of Earth Magnetic Magnitude.

Anyhow, this is not more than a calculation for 𝜵*B,some more attract our attention are the sources that induce the Earth Magnetism, someone are from the electric charges on the Earth and in the atmosphere;while some other ones are in Near Earth Space.

Q3-How is the influence from potential gradient ‘’E’’ and displacement current ‘’J’’ to Earth Magnetism?

By Maxwell, as matter of facts, the variation of electric field can induce the magnetism. We even do some review for questions 1 and 2. However, for a better pragmatic concept, another figure is to be considered: The fluctuation of total area of thunderstorm in the world.


Figure 7–The fluctuation of global thunderstorm area (km2).

Almost every electric and magnetic incident in the world is created and developed by‘’J’’ and ‘’E’’ as discussed in several paragraphs before, and even in this essay. But the conspicuous subject is the total area of thunderstorm in the world, the figure 7 above is an important reference from NOAA.

In general, the fluctuation of total thunderstorm area in above graph is explained as consequence of ‘’E’’ and ‘’J’’ fluctuation, the displacement current ‘’J’’ variation makes the value of charge on Earth surface changed, and then one place is different from the other. Consequently, the charge on land surface contributes to Earth Magnetism (Chapter I-Air-Earth current and Chapter II-Contributions from Land & Sea surfaces to Earth Magnetism by Biot-Sawart laws.)

The move that makes the electric charge on the Earth surface changed in order to change the Earth Magnetism at all time.

(Problem (this can be a reference to student or lecturer): The contributions from sea surface and land surface to Earth Magnetism at 13hrs GMT? If The Earth is neutral or total charges on land surface and sea surface is null, every land square km under thunderstorm cloud is charged with 106 Coulomb.)

Q4 – Is any electromagnetic wave created from atmosphere electric?

Electric field fluctuation is to induce magnetic field and vis-a-versa. This is traditional electromagnetic theory in science, it is also fundamental theory of electromagnetic wave transmission, and it is known to the world.

By the theory mentioned above, the fluctuation of electric field described in figure 2 can be viewed as an oscillation which produces one or several electromagnetic waves. The waves are emitted into universe with such a huge power that nothing can stop or consume them all…

The electromagnetic wave detectors on board spaceship can realize these waves from Earth.




Figure 8-Basic frequency (Left)and the form of original wave (Right) incorporated in 1 coordinate for comparison(Cited from Fourier manual)

All waveforms, no matter what you scribble or observe in the universe, are actually just the sum of simple sinusoids of different frequencies.(Fourier)

My own speculation, the 2 obvious waves can be detected from outer space are wave of T≈k1*640’, and T≈k2*1600’are popular with huge output regardless the capacitor-coil are found or not.




Figure 9 – Principal description of electromagnetic wave creator.

CONCLUSION:

-Although the homograph of E and J are applied everywhere in the world.
-Although the differential equation of Ampere-Maxwell does not bring us an accurate outcome for Earth Magnetic magnitude at any time. But the gradient of Earth Magnetism (𝜵*B=µ0*(J +Ɛ0*δE/δt)) at any time is found throughout every 24hrs to affirm that: if revolution of the two quantities (E and J) is 24 hr. time, then the revolution of Earth Magnetism revolution is 24hr too.

There are several magnetic inducers to Earth Magnetism found, therefore every calculation depending on functions of atmospheric electric field and displacement current can’t bring satisfactory result. So, we can’t claim Ampere-Maxwell equation a perfect instrument for predicting the current value of Earth Magnetism.

Another reason for above negative comment is that the Earth Magnetic vector does not just vary in time, but also at location where the vector is observed; while Ampere-Maxwell may give out a result that depends only on GMT.

-Although the fluctuation of ‘’E’’ and ‘’J’’ –as above considered with Ampere-Maxwell equations--may influence to Earth Magnetism ambiguously. But consequence of the fluctuation--the thunderstorm area--is an important figure that contributes enormously to Earth Magnetism and makes it varying with revolution of 24hr (discussed in chapter III).

-The Earth in its atmosphere with Ion layers establish a unit in the universe, that unit is creating electromagnetic waves and emitting them into the universe.

I hope that one day, a certain satellite in outer space will detect those emitting waves; these are created by nature and from Earth. Unlike the known waves from Earth, these mentioned waves are produced in Earth atmosphere with unknown output. The waves are produced continuously, unlimited power and non-stoppable. They are voices broadcasting from our Earth.


  

Hanoi Nov. 30th 2018
Nguyen Van Cuong
Advisor/Editor: Phd. Vu Bang


Saturday, 11 November 2017

CHAPTER I/p2-VAN ALLEN BELT CONTRIBUTION

VAN ALLEN BELT

I-General about Van Allen belts:


I and many among my colleagues used to view Earth’s magnetic field as one that can only facilitate the magnetic compass to indicate the North magnetic direction and no more it can offer. But the Van Allen belt appears to change our mind; the Earth’s magnetic field is not very strong but good enough in facilitating the establishment of Van Allen belt which can stop any fast moving charged particle. The Van Allen belt, as matter of fact, plays an important role in protecting our planet.
(The following is almost prepared with close reference to SPACE & NASA’s documents and papers, which are open to everyone and nothing is from classified information.)



(By NASA)


1-What is Van Allen belt: a collection of charged particles, gathered by Earth’s magnetism, in a shape of belts around Earth.

2-The earliest discovery to the belts: 1958 by Explorer 1 (NASA’s Satellite).
-Belt’s structure: normally 2 belts, one is separated from the other by a large drain/gap; can split up to 3 belts or merged in one sometimes. The inner belt is almost close to Earth surface at minimum about 400 miles; while the outer belt is rather far and even stretches to 36000 miles.
The drain is discovered in 2012; a remarkable feature of the belt is that its drain can stop the ultra-fast electron in there. The scientists from NASA are still not determined about reason for the belt separation. Their hesitation is quite understandable because no mechanism of electric force or magnetic field is found linking to the wax & wane activity of the belts (which is in conjunction with Sun’s activity). The scientists likely ascribe to the particles from space or the Sun.
The unidentified particles or quarks might be gathered among the belts and create an unknown field between them, the field makes the belts split-up wide.

-How the belts work: They can wax and wane in response to incoming energy from the Sun, sometime swelling up enough to expose satellites in low-Earth orbit to damaging radiation.

-Undiscovered about the belts: With some satellites working on space at all the time; the more research to the belts are carried out, the more expect to be discovered; even the unidentified particle or quark.

-Plasmasphere: A companion to the belts is a giant plasma sphere which can be assumed as twinned to the belts. The plasma sphere is cloud of relative cool and charged particles that fills the outermost region of Earth’s atmosphere. That sphere begins approximately at 400-600 miles (rather close to Earth surface) and extends partially to outer Van Allen belt.


PROBLEM

If total charge of the Van Allen belts and plasma sphere is equivalent to a single band of +106 Coulombs around Earth equator at a distance 1500 km from Earth surface, and evenly distributed on it.

How is the magnetism induced by the Band to the equator (Earth)? 



(V-A 01)

   
    
Where unit of ‘’Q’’ is in Coulomb and unit of ‘’d’’ is km.
Replace Q=106 Coulombs, d=1500 km (as assumed) into the above formula:

  Δ(3)= -8.4169*10-23 *666.666667=10-20*5.611267 Tesla

(Note: the Belt is assumed as on a plane perpendicular to Earth’s rotating axis, the assumption is not verified and the reality definitely is not be so. Therefore, in order to calculate for a better accuracy, the belt as well as the plasma sphere can be represented by many bands (or hoops) in a larger problem).

Conclusion:

If Van Allen belt and plasma sphere are equivalent to a band of Q Coulombs (the Band) around the Earth on plane of Earth’s equator. The Band is to induce magnetism on Earth’s equator; its additional intensity is calculated as (V-A 01):




 
In reality, Van Allen belts and plasma sphere are not only changing in shape and size, but also in intensity. With such a complicated change, the above mentioned ‘’Δ3’’ demonstrates nothing but ‘’yes’’ to the question ‘’influence?’’. Furthermore, as noted above, the larger problem is required to estimate the additional magnetic intensity with better accuracy.